What is the difference between PECS and Avaz?

Modified on Mon, 21 Jul at 3:44 PM

PECS is a low-tech version of AAC (Augmentative and alternative Communication), whereas Avaz is a high-tech version of AAC. 


Avaz is a hi-tech AAC app that runs on iOS (iPads and iPhones) and Android (tabs and phones). 


Here is what differentiates Avaz from PECS:

AspectPECSAvaz
Tech level Low tech (printed - physical pictures)High-tech (digital, speech-generating) - has images and voice output
Voice No voice output

Has a range of voices and accents to choose from. You can pick one that suits your child's age and gender

Vocabulary

Has an in-built graded vocabulary of around 4000-5000 words that you can start using off-the-shelf

Primary use
Requesting (early communication)
Full range of communication


Has an in-built library of over 60,000 symbols from Symbolstix that can be added to your app

Customization

Highly customizable

Limited (needs printed pictures)

Adding pictures - In Avaz, you can add pictures in a few seconds to customize and personalize it for the AAC user. Unlike in PECS where you have to find pictures, download, print, laminate and add velcro strips to each picture to start using it. All these are completely avoided and photos can be added within a few seconds to Avaz app. This makes Avaz extremely scaleable to use.









AspectPECSAAC App
Tech levelLow-tech (physical pictures)High-tech (digital, speech-generating)



  • Portability - the app can be easily carried wherever you go, regardless of the size of vocabulary. In PECS however, once the vocabulary grows, the size becomes more bulky and less portable. 
  • The ease of customization, portability and scaleability make Avaz far superior to a low-tech version such as PECS.


Please browse the Avaz FAQ - for more details about Avaz. 


 



Was this article helpful?

That’s Great!

Thank you for your feedback

Sorry! We couldn't be helpful

Thank you for your feedback

Let us know how can we improve this article!

Select at least one of the reasons

Feedback sent

We appreciate your effort and will try to fix the article